But What If I Hurt Their Feelings?: Supporting Students to Give Authentic Peer Feedback

October 29, 2015

  The Common Core standards deem that students should engage in constructive feedback of peer’s work and ideas from kindergarten and beyond. But what does this really look like? What do students experience on a social-emotional level when they are asked to give constructive criticism to a peer? Moreover, what supports do they need from each other and from their teachers to generate effective critical comments? These are questions Ginny Tremblay has explored through her inquiry work over the last several years. “But what if I hurt their feelings?” There is a look of genuine fear and discomfort in my student’s eyes as she plaintively asks this question. For a fifteen-year-old, being told that she must publically critique her peer’s artwork seems tantamount to being asked to wear all her clothes backwards for the day. It makes her feel exposed, it makes her feel like she will say the wrong thing, be perceived in a way she did not intend - kryptonite to most of us, but especially to teenagers. Origin Story My inquiry began several years ago, when I first became an art teacher. I knew that I wanted to implement the routine of critique in my classroom; I felt it would make the experience of making and thinking about art more Real, more authentic. It was important for students to be able to give and recive valuable feedback to improve their craft.

Teacher Inquiry in Action Forum: March 26, 2015

December 2, 2014

Save the date for our annual Inquiry in Action Forum on March 26th from 5-7:30pm at Mills College. Learn from our teacher scholars about the work they are doing in schools across the East Bay. Click to watch a...

Leading Through Learning. Learning Through Leading.

October 23, 2014

In this blog post Mills Teacher Scholar Executive Director Carrie Wilson describes how teacher leaders build their instructional leadership capacity at the Teacher Scholar Leader Network sessions, a cross-district network of  teacher scholar leaders from partner sites. Each of these teacher leaders is facilitating, or co-facilitating with Mills Teacher Scholar staff, a cross-grade inquiry group at their site. On a sunny Saturday afternoon in October, twenty Bay Area teacher scholar leaders are seated in a large circle with their heads cocked, leaning into the center of the room. They are on their second listening of an audio recording of third graders in a bilingual classroom discussing what they know about the sun and the moon. These are veteran teacher scholars who, after just a single listening, can skillfully pull out nuances of what each child contributes in the partner conversation. They note the student’s knowledge of the symbolism of color, the informal register that allows for the expression of unformed ideas, the way the conversation begins as a narrative and shifts to expository talk, and the students’ ability to connect personal experiences with scientific concepts. As the teacher leaders share what they notice after the first listening, Mills Teacher Scholars staff documents what the teachers gleaned from the data. The documentation quickly reaches two pages, but is only the first step of the process. As they sit in the circle and listen to the audio data for a second time, the teacher leaders are not simply listening to learn about students, but they are listening with the intention of learning how to lead their colleagues to listen to data in a similar way. The questions that guide their work in the Mills Teacher Scholars Leader Network are: How, as teacher leaders, can we use data to help our colleagues to more deeply understand the learning goals they have for their students and also understand how individual students think in relation to each goal? What is involved in leading adults’ learning about their students’ learning?

School Sites Focus Topics on Common Core State Standards Related Competencies

October 27, 2013

 Academic discussions. Grappling with complex text. Supporting ideas with claims and evidence. These are key concepts  in the age of the CCSS and each of our school site partners have chosen one of these areas as a focal point for their classroom-based inquiries. MTS school site participants will have complementary inquiries that support the larger umbrella topic and deepen the staff's understanding of student learning within a particular area.

Powerful Impact: Restorative Justice + Teacher-led Inquiry

April 4, 2013

Mills Teacher Scholar, Dana Sudduth, has been teaching in Oakland for over 20 years, and many Oakland students have learned strong reading skills thanks to her excellent teaching. This year, she was asked to apply her understanding of reading to a group of students at Montera Middle School. These were students who, as Dana wrote in one of her Mills Teacher Scholars reflections, “were chosen for this class because of low test scores. They consist of mostly African American and Latino students.”

Gratitude

December 20, 2012

We are grateful to the private foundations and public school districts that fund our work to make schools vibrant learning places for teachers so that they, in turn, may provide improved learning opportunities for...

Teachers’ Quest for Powerful Real-Time Data

December 20, 2012

  by Carrie Wilson “What does a successful science journal look like in second grade?” “What do I hope this partner reading conversation sounds like?” “What data would indicate that my students have really internalized the science concept we are studying?” These are the kinds of questions that our teacher scholars grapple with in their collaborative Mills Teacher Scholars work sessions. On the surface, these questions may seem straightforward. But in practice, seeking thoughtful answers to questions about student understanding of content involves delving in to messy issues. Perhaps the most common struggle our teachers scholars face is teasing apart evidence of student understanding from evidence of a student’s ability to follow directions. Upon looking closely and reflecting with colleagues teachers discover that a well scaffolded assignment  may yield more data about students’ ability to follow directions than about their understanding of the key concepts. So how can we figure out what students really understand?